yeah, I have that '.1'. I had got it before asking on this mailing list... trying to get it working that was something that google brought up.
thanks Rory, I'll try that... I wasn't able to get gcc 3.4.5 working. On Sunday 15 January 2006 12:27 pm, Dunk Fordyce wrote: > just to note it must be pyrex 0.9.3.1 - the .1 is important as thats when > the gcc4 patches got applied > > On Sunday 15 January 2006 15:12, Rory Yorke wrote: > > Dunk Fordyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> How would I get gcc 3.4? I don't have it in my SuSE repositories. You > > >> think that would really make a difference having an older version of > > >> it? > > > > Does SuSE use gcc 4.0 for its kernel? > > > > I'd recommend using Soya from CVS -- I have managed to compile that on > > Ubuntu 5.10, using gcc 4.0.2 and Pyrex 0.9.3. > > > > I did fail to compile Soya 0.10.1, with similar errors to Joey's, > > though in _ode.c, not _soya.c. Oddly enough, Ubuntu provide Soya > > 0.10.1 as a .deb, so they must have build rules which work. > > > > Hope this helps, > > > > Rory > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Soya-user mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/soya-user > > _______________________________________________ > Soya-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/soya-user
