On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 22:20:00 +0200 Rory Yorke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings, > > I think that there's a bug in coordsyst.pyx, revision 1.22, and that > the little patch below is correct. OK, I've applied it to the CVS. Thanks ! > Incidentally, the quaternions are reversed from what I'm used to; > e.g., no-rotation corresponds to [0,0,0,1], while I was expecting > [1,0,0,0]. Is this a common convention? I think [1,0,0,0] is a mathematical convention and [0,0,0,1] a "progammatical" convention :-) Jiba
