-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Arc Riley wrote: > If you are comfortable doing free work under these conditions and feel > it's vital for PIL to have support for these formats, then I think > you're volunteering. Have at it. Don't imply any of us should.
Sorry, but this is *not* what I have said. > I will not work on proprietary code, giving someone else copyright under > a verbal agreement that they will release my changes under the GPL after > they've profited by selling my code for a few months. This is also not > an option for the work any student is doing for Summer of Code since > there's an agreement in place that any code they write be free/open. Is anybody asking you to do this? Why should your code to support e.g. Theora be part of PIL? Jiba said it really clearly already. I really do not understand why it has to be either "my way or no way". Feel free to contribute with GPL version of your code *as a standalone* library/extension and leave the PIL support as it is. On the other hand, you could have even forked the GPL version of PIL if you really wanted, but that is another matter. Please, do not try to fix what is not broken, OK? Jan - -- Jan Ciger GPG public key: http://www.keyserver.net/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mandriva - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEW8ICn11XseNj94gRApLnAJ46hk8fxTHWQTUimIV38E1mig4koQCfby0m 9aApYLwuPl7TglOVHCVDJ4c= =fnCK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Soya-user mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/soya-user
