> > Similarly, Soya's website should rely on militant hosting too. > > I'm really curious, what about GNA! do you consider militant? Why do > you consider military hosting to be better than any other?
It seems that "militant" has not the same meaning in French... in French it means "associative", not military. > > BTW Soya is GPL'ed, but I realize I've never say under which licence > > was the editorial content of my dead wiki on nekeme server. Pillaging > > this editorial content in your own wiki/trac without saying me a word > > was both 1) not gentle 2) surely illegal 3) inconsequent, since having > > several wikis leads to synchronization problems. > > Are you saying that you are publishing information for a free software > project, on a wiki, soliciting contributions, under a non-free license? I am saying i have even not asked myself the question yet. > Does the same apply to your "new" soya pages on your personal project > website? Is this information also proprietary? The perfect licence for editorial content such as website doesn't exist yet, IMO. Free software licences don't fit well, since e.g. the "History" or "Soya's spirit" page are not understood to be modified. You didn't reply to point 1) and 3). BTW, the news for Soya 0.10.4 on the wiki is wrong, as far as i know image and land have not been changed; it is an illustration of point 3). If you want Soya news, you should incorporate the Soya news RSS from OOmadness. I believe there are things that last and things that don't. Wikis are good for things that don't last and evolve fast, and this is why i've linked your wiki TOD and FAC from OOmadness. However, I believe wikis or tracs are not good for presenting a project. Jiba _______________________________________________ Soya-user mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/soya-user
