--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > "I appreciate that, sir. I was thinking that if
> we had the time, we
> could
> > work on fine-tuning the fission converters to make
> them more efficient.
> It
> > would help if we could arrange the power
> transport points to allow for
> fewer
> > packet collisions."
>
> {If you check the work logs, that work was done
> while repairs were being
> made, and transfer points were more than doubled in
> number to act as a
> redundancy system in case of a system failure. By
> 'pet projects', I meant station
> additions and possible theoretical ideas.}
>
> "My apologies, sir," replied Celine. "I
> misunderstood what you meant. As we
> all know, there is always room for systems'
> improvements. I thought you
> were looking for something like that." It was clear
> that she was pulling back
> since the conversation had moved from being friendly
> to being purely
> professional.
>
{By the change in your EM, I 'see' I have made you
uncomfortable. Excuse me if I have, but our work here
is untechnical for myself as I am used to designing
and building not routine maintenece. One goes where
Fleet says.}
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new Resources site
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
_______________________________________________
Spacedock mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.starbase1.org/mailman/listinfo/spacedock_starbase1.org
