Stephan,
>Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:23:02 -0700
>From: Stephen John Smoogen <[email protected]>
>On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Devan Goodwin <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:33:58 -0500 (EST)
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I've tried to install both the 64-bit version and the 32-bit version,
>>> both on CentOS 5.2 (Final). I've been trying this for a week (29/30
>>> Jan). Fresh install of o/s (running under VMware ESX as a "guest"
>>> system). What I've installed is what's pulled down with yum for
>>> spacewalk .4
>>>
>>> I've followed all the directions, including the oracle post-install
>>> additional config, and put selinux in permissive mode. I've also
>>> made /etc/rhn/rhn.conf readable by apache. And run cobbler-setup. And
>>> fixed some issues that cobbler check wanted.
>>
>> This right here sets off alarm bells, whatever is causing
>> you to have to do these above steps (chmod rhn.conf, cobbler-setup,
>> etc) is very likely to be the root of your problems. I think you need
>> to hit the brakes here and figure out what's causing this before
>> proceeding.
>
>It sounds to me that a system wide umask is causing problems. That
>would also cause problems with 500. I remember having this problem
>with cfengine and rpm a long time ago.. it would set its umask to 077
>and everything coming out would be wrong permissions causing all kinds
>of odd behavior.
Interesting. The permissions under /var/www/html are all 755 for directories,
and 644 on files, and everything's root:root. Is any of that wrong?
Under /etc/rhn, I only changed that one file, IIRC. The rest seem to be owned,
with permissions the same, as on the test system with spacewalk .1
And I just disabled selinux and rebooted.
mark
_______________________________________________
Spacewalk-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
