Problem we have is some of the commit logs are very wordy (which is ok but the first sentence isn't descriptive enough) and others are so terse that I don't bother including them: fixed unit test.
Would it be valuable to preface trivial commit messages with something so they can be filtered out? I don't want to make an overly complicated commit log process, but if generated change logs become valuable it might be worth it.
At the same time, if the commit doesn't start with a BZ number can it just be automatically considered trivial? One could make the argument that any "changelog-worthy" work should have a BZ assigned to it.
-- Jason Dobies RHN Satellite / Spacewalk RHCE# 805008743336126 Freenode: jdob @ #spacewalk #spacewalk-devel _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
