Jeff Ortel <[email protected]> writes:
> One of the items that resurfaced is synonyms. The original plan was
> to do away with the synonyms because postgres does not support them.
> I've removed references to the synonyms in the schema (insert files)
> but the monitoring code seems to depend heavily on them. So, do leave
> the synonyms in the schema as oracle specific (the monitoring code
> will be broken for postgres) or do we replace references to the
> synonyms in the monitoring code for 0.6? Can someone comment on the
> LOE for this?
Perhaps we could use views as a PG substitute for synonyms? I agree
with the idea of getting rid of them over the long term, but it would be
nice to not have that in the critical path if there is a lot of code
that would have to change.
regards, tom lane
_______________________________________________
Spacewalk-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
