Cliff I know I'm going OT, but I can't help thinking that RHEV-M must be tied in here somewhere...
CC On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Colin Coe <colin....@gmail.com> wrote: > Please tell me that Satellite/System Engine isn't going to end up > looking line the new RHN... > > CC > > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:16 AM, Cliff Perry <cpe...@redhat.com> wrote: >> On 05/10/2011 03:59 AM, duncan.in...@virginmoney.com wrote: >>> >>> Um, wow! >>> >>> That's certainly big news. Is work on Spacewalk going to tail off then? >> >> Red Hat is committed to continue to sponsor Spacewalk. Red Hat will >> continue to be actively involved in Spacewalk, contributing code upstream, >> as RHN Satellite today continues to be Red Hat's primary systems management >> solution for managing the life cycle of Red Hat Enterprise Linux for >> traditional data centers. Over time our contributions though will go down as >> we approach the End of Life for Satellite 5.x for our customers. >> >>> I can understand the direction and can see why Red Hat would be going >>> towards the cloud. There are still going to be a large number of >>> companies for whom Satellite is more than adequate. Will Satellite be >> >> The Satellite product question is best answered from your Red Hat account >> rep in private. I'm more than willing to share the presentation we made last >> week at the Summit (which is public information now) and give a commitment >> that we are not abandoning the Spacewalk project, but acknowledging that our >> long term strategy for this code base has changed. I'm pleased to say we >> have a strong community of users as well as growing list of enhacement & >> bugfix contributors. >> >> Regards, >> Cliff >> >>> offered in parallel? >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Duncan >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Cliff Perry <cpe...@redhat.com> >>> To: spacewalk-devel@redhat.com >>> Cc: duncan.in...@virginmoney.com >>> Date: 09/05/2011 17:02 >>> Subject: Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Func vs osad vs AMQP >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> >>> On 05/09/2011 11:35 AM, duncan.in...@virginmoney.com wrote: >>> > Guys, >>> > >>> > Just a quick question about the func v osad debate. Is there any work >>> > going on regarding replacing osad with func? I recall it being tossed >>> > around a while ago, but hadn't heard anything recently. Or perhaps >>> AMQP? >>> > Would be a shame to keep using osad; it's the single flakiest part of >>> > Satellite in my experience. >>> > >>> > Cheers >>> > >>> > Duncan >>> >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Spacewalk-devel mailing list >>> > Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com >>> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel >>> >>> AMQP will be used in the future replacement of Satellite (called System >>> Engine). See Summit roadmap presentation: >>> >>> >>> http://www.redhat.com/summit/2011/presentations/summit/whats_next/thursday/summit-2011.warner_sanders_t_1400_future_of_satellite-v5.pdf >>> >>> This though will likely not be changed in Spacewalk and will continue to >>> use osad / jabberd for the near term future. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Cliff >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Spacewalk-devel mailing list >> Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel >> > > > > -- > RHCE#805007969328369 > -- RHCE#805007969328369 _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-devel mailing list Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
