On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Justin Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On the "Channels" page we currently have 3 different lists ("Relevant",
> "All", and "Retired"). This made sense for hosted, but for us can we rip
> out the "Relevant" and "Retired" lists?
>
> Currently a channel is relevant if it is x86 (32bit), you have a system
> subscribed to it, or it is a custom channel. IMHO a channel should be
> relevant if it exists on the satellite.
>
> Also, I believe it is causing some performance issues for some of the larger
> users of the product with many many systems (checking to see if one system
> is subscribed to each channel when you have 1000s of systems and hundreds of
> channels is time consuming).
I see value in still having relevant vs all. It allows me to see what
channels are
actually used. So if we can come up with a way to show what channels are
used and those that are not, that would suffice.
jesus
_______________________________________________
Spacewalk-list mailing list
Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
