Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Justin Sherrill wrote:
Hi,
On the "Channels" page we currently have 3 different lists
("Relevant", "All", and "Retired"). This made sense for hosted, but
for us can we rip out the "Relevant" and "Retired" lists?
Currently a channel is relevant if it is x86 (32bit), you have a
system subscribed to it, or it is a custom channel. IMHO a channel
should be relevant if it exists on the satellite.
-1
We have in Brno satellite with a lot of channels in several arch (i386,
x86_64, ppc) and if I have only i386 machine registered to this
satellite, the "Relevant" shows only relevant (ie. i386) channels.
My vote say: leave it as it is.
OK, my previous comment was crap. Now I tried it and you are correct.
But I still do not agree that "Relevant" should display all available on
sat.
How I would like it:
"Relevant" - channels to which my login have registered at least one
machine.
"All" - channels to which my organization have entitlements.
"Retired" - Dunno, how many users have something there...
I think the above is actually how people expect it to work. The
question is, on a fresh Satellite with no systems registered, we may
want "Relevant" to actually show something, which is why I think i386
always shows up.
Perhaps it should be:
"Relevant" - channels to which my login have registered at least one
machine. If no machines, show same as All.
"All" - channels to which my organization have entitlements.
"Retired" - leave as-is.
_______________________________________________
Spacewalk-list mailing list
Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
