On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 4:07 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Folks, > > >Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 22:28:04 +0000 (GMT) > >From: John Hodrien <[email protected]> > >Subject: RE: [Spacewalk-list] Why I want to give up on spacewalk > >To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> > > > >On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Coe, Colin C. (Unix Engineer) wrote: > > > >> I would have said 2GB RAM minimum. > > > >And I'm looking forward to moving onto a box with more. A 0.3 install > with 4G > >has been acting a /lot/ happier than a 0.4 install on 2G. > > The .1 version in test is happy, apparently, with 1G. However, when I ran > top, and watched the memory as I just tried to hit the manage button, and it > didn't max out. I'm afraid there's something deeper missing here. >
I think so too... I have a Spacewalk instance running just fine on 512 MB RAM on CentOS. I haven't registered any clients yet, but I don't think that matters much. Best regards, -- gurjeet[[email protected] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com singh.gurj...@{ gmail | hotmail | indiatimes | yahoo }.com
_______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
