On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 01:54:00PM +0200, Jan Pazdziora wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 12:35:49PM +0100, David Nutter wrote: > > > I assume now that autocommit is on that --dry-run as currently coded > > has no effect as it requires a transaction rollback? > > The AutoCommit is off. Any other database operations are now > transactional even if they were AutoCommitting in the past.
Oh dear, I seem to have a bad case of Monday Brain! Apologies for failing to read your post properly. > Which I suspect might also be the cause of the other problems that > you've reported with monitoring in Spacewalk 1.4. Sadly, I was not > able to find the time needed to investigate that theory more. If you > have a Spacewalk server where you could check it, that would be great. I shall certainly have a look. A quick grep in current master sources shows no references to begin_work in the monitoring code but I'll compare with what's on my server. Thanks & regards, -- David Nutter Tel: +44 (0)131 650 4888 BioSS, JCMB, King's Buildings, Mayfield Rd, EH9 3JZ. Scotland, UK Biomathematics and Statistics Scotland (BioSS) is formally part of The James Hutton Institute (JHI), a registered Scottish charity No. SC041796 and a company limited by guarantee No. SC374831 _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
