I think it does unless I'm wrong, and it actually update base on erratas. I have it tested and it works but better test it yourself.
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Mathew Snyder <[email protected]>wrote: > The spacewalk-clone-by-date command doesn't indicate any means of updating > an existing clone. It only implies that it is used to clone existing > channels. > > Can you provide more context for your answer, please? > > -Mathew > > "When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at > all." - God; Futurama > > "We'll get along much better once you accept that you're wrong and > neither am I." - Me > > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Lupin Deterd <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Yes, check the clone-by-date. >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Mathew Snyder >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Is it possible to update a clone channel with new errata? >>> >>> The process we currently follow is to sync the official channels with >>> RHN and then create new clones afterward. I'd rather sync the official >>> channel with RHN and then basically sync the clone with the official >>> channel? >>> >>> -Mathew >>> >>> "When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at >>> all." - God; Futurama >>> >>> "We'll get along much better once you accept that you're wrong and >>> neither am I." - Me >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Spacewalk-list mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Spacewalk-list mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Spacewalk-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >
_______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
