That's the expected behaviour I believed as it works against the erratas, you will notice that package counts on cloned channel will be lesser that the source..etc but apparently it's not an issue and I confirmed that as well as my clients grow on its errata list that needs updating.
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Mathew Snyder <[email protected]>wrote: > While it doesn't indicate that re-cloning a channel into an existing > channel performs an update, I did go forward with some tests and found that > to be the basic behavior. > > There is one issue I encountered, though: When the update completed, there > were four packages in the source channel (itself a clone of the official > base channel) which were not added to the destination clone channel. I was > able to incorporate them using a merge and will likely look at that option > via the API going forward. Just wanted to point out the minor issue I > encountered. > > -Mathew > > "When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at > all." - God; Futurama > > "We'll get along much better once you accept that you're wrong and > neither am I." - Me > > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Lupin Deterd <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I think it does unless I'm wrong, and it actually update base on erratas. >> I have it tested and it works but better test it yourself. >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Mathew Snyder >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> The spacewalk-clone-by-date command doesn't indicate any means of >>> updating an existing clone. It only implies that it is used to clone >>> existing channels. >>> >>> Can you provide more context for your answer, please? >>> >>> -Mathew >>> >>> "When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at >>> all." - God; Futurama >>> >>> "We'll get along much better once you accept that you're wrong and >>> neither am I." - Me >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Lupin Deterd <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Yes, check the clone-by-date. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Mathew Snyder < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Is it possible to update a clone channel with new errata? >>>>> >>>>> The process we currently follow is to sync the official channels with >>>>> RHN and then create new clones afterward. I'd rather sync the official >>>>> channel with RHN and then basically sync the clone with the official >>>>> channel? >>>>> >>>>> -Mathew >>>>> >>>>> "When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything >>>>> at all." - God; Futurama >>>>> >>>>> "We'll get along much better once you accept that you're wrong and >>>>> neither am I." - Me >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Spacewalk-list mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Spacewalk-list mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Spacewalk-list mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Spacewalk-list mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Spacewalk-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >
_______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
