Daryl Child channel yes, Base channel no!
Take care Em 13/11/2014 17:43, "Daryl Rose" <rosed...@gmail.com> escreveu: > Can I register the same client to two different channels? > > Thank you > > Daryl > > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Ethan Bonick <ethan.bon...@truqua.com> > wrote: > >> You shouldn’t have to do that. I have mine set up as separate channels on >> CentOS and they work independently. I would try out the Solaris if I had >> the time, but I don’t. I also don’t know Solaris really all that much, >> hopefully someone else can chime in. >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> [image: >> https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/pPQYWyEgd3U9tfRSLCOfyEAjztZRe-j4nPYRdMYrN6FGIZFJEo-O3D-nQ5mhhJA1aetmO-GtoGO7U3mYiw2fDUZIGYNtR5ifQ4hOE_g1rRE0sUqsJlk] >> >> *Ethan Bonick** | Information Technology * >> *TruQua* >> Mobile 630.445.9313 >> Office 312.525.8790 >> >> *CONFIDENTIAL: *This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and >> may be protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, >> be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail >> or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, >> please reply and notify the sender and delete this copy from your system. >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* spacewalk-list-boun...@redhat.com [mailto: >> spacewalk-list-boun...@redhat.com] *On Behalf Of *Daryl Rose >> *Sent:* Thursday, November 13, 2014 10:56 AM >> *To:* spacewalk-list@redhat.com >> *Subject:* Re: [Spacewalk-list] How to properly setup Solaris Channels >> >> >> >> Ethan, >> >> >> >> To answer your questions, yes. Yes, I ran the rhn_check -vv on the client >> server, and yes the server had checked in. So, the updates channel was a >> child of the base, so when I re-registered the client, it should have known >> about the child because it was part of the activation key. >> >> >> >> I've since blown away the base channel and the child channel and combined >> everything into a single channel. I know see that there are over 900 >> updates available, which should be pretty accurate, however, I don't like >> all of patches and packages intermixed. It makes it difficult to figure >> out whats what. however, that is how the CentOS channel is, all three >> repositories combined into a single large list, so maybe I just have to get >> used to it. >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> >> >> Daryl >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Ethan Bonick <ethan.bon...@truqua.com> >> wrote: >> >> Have you run an rhn_check or has the server checked in get to get the new >> channel config? My guess would be it doesn't know about the channel yet. >> When you re-registered did you make sure the child channel is subscribed to >> by the base channel? I know some of it is low level and you might have >> checked already, but never hurts to ask. Also did you remove the repo or >> just the channel? >> >> >> *Ethan Bonick | *Information Technology >> *TruQua* >> >> *CONFIDENTIAL: *This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and >> may be protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, >> be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail >> or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, >> please reply and notify the sender and delete this copy from your system. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Daryl Rose <rosed...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> When I initially setup Solaris, I did just a single channel just for >> patches. However, I decided that I want to also have a base channel as >> well. Currently, if I want to add a new package to a Solaris server, I >> have to either pop a dvd into the drive, or NFS an ISO image. However, >> this is what SW is for. A repository of all of the packages, plus updates >> that may need to be applied. >> >> >> >> I made a new base channel and imported all of the installation packages >> into it. However, I already had an update channel with a system assigned >> to it. What I am trying to figure out is; what is the correct way to set >> up the two channels? >> >> >> >> I removed the updates channel, and recreated it as a child of the base >> channel. I had previously removed the subscribed system, so I resubscribed >> to the base channel. There are over 2000 packages in the base channel, and >> 381 in the updates channel. I thought that once I resubscribed the server >> to the base/child updates channel, I would see needed updates. I know that >> there should be 80 updates needed on this server, however, SW tells me that >> the system is up to date. >> >> >> >> When I setup the CentOS Channel, I created three repositories: Base, >> Updates and Extra's. All three are then assigned to the CentOS channel. >> There are now over 8000 packages available for the CentOS server. Is best >> practice to put *ALL *base packages and updates together in a single >> channel so that way the Solaris server can see everything? Why doesn't the >> client server see the child channel and SW tell me that it needs updates? >> >> >> >> Thank you. >> >> >> >> Daryl >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Spacewalk-list mailing list >> Spacewalk-list@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Spacewalk-list mailing list >> Spacewalk-list@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Spacewalk-list mailing list >> Spacewalk-list@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Spacewalk-list mailing list > Spacewalk-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >
_______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list Spacewalk-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list