Sorry, Daryl! B'Regards
______________ Atenciosamente Waldirio msn: [email protected] Skype: waldirio Site: www.waldirio.com.br Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br LinkedIn: http://br.linkedin.com/pub/waldirio-pinheiro/22/b21/646 PGP: www.waldirio.com.br/public.html On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Waldirio Manhães Pinheiro < [email protected]> wrote: > Daryk > > Can you post some pics in the web ?! > > If you prefer, can send me directly by email. > > B'Regards > > ______________ > Atenciosamente > Waldirio > msn: [email protected] > Skype: waldirio > Site: www.waldirio.com.br > Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br > LinkedIn: http://br.linkedin.com/pub/waldirio-pinheiro/22/b21/646 > PGP: www.waldirio.com.br/public.html > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Daryl Rose <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Waldirio, >> >> I just realized that the example that you provided me was a channel and >> repositories. That is exactly how I have the CentOS channel setup. A >> single channel with three repositories. >> >> Solaris doesn't have repositories that I can draw from that is why I am >> adding the packages and patches to the channel(s). >> >> Thanks. >> >> Daryl >> >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Waldirio Manhães Pinheiro < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Daryl, good afternoon >>> >>> Sure, no problem. Take a look in >>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/2014-October/msg00222.html >>> . >>> >>> You can create in your environment different's base channels, for >>> example: >>> >>> B centos6.4 >>> >>> B centos6.5 >>> >>> B centos6.6 >>> >>> You can subscribe your client just in one Base Channel, only centos6.4 >>> or centos6.5 or centos6.6, although you can use epel, flash, vmwaretools, >>> so you can create child channels, like example bellow: >>> >>> B centos6.4 >>> | -- epel_6_x86-64 >>> | -- vmware_tools_6_x86-64 >>> | -- xpto_6_x86-64 >>> >>> B centos6.5 >>> >>> B centos6.6 >>> >>> Now, if you have you client subscribed in centos6.4, you can sign too >>> child channels (epel, vmware and xpto). >>> >>> Make sense to you ?! >>> >>> Let me know !! >>> >>> B'Regards >>> >>> >>> ______________ >>> Atenciosamente >>> Waldirio >>> msn: [email protected] >>> Skype: waldirio >>> Site: www.waldirio.com.br >>> Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br >>> LinkedIn: http://br.linkedin.com/pub/waldirio-pinheiro/22/b21/646 >>> PGP: www.waldirio.com.br/public.html >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Daryl Rose <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Waldirio, >>>> >>>> Would you please clarify that comment? Are you telling me to create a >>>> base channel and a child channel, and then subscribe to the child channel? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Daryl >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Waldirio Manhães Pinheiro < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Daryl >>>>> >>>>> Child channel yes, Base channel no! >>>>> >>>>> Take care >>>>> Em 13/11/2014 17:43, "Daryl Rose" <[email protected]> escreveu: >>>>> >>>>>> Can I register the same client to two different channels? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you >>>>>> >>>>>> Daryl >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Ethan Bonick < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> You shouldn’t have to do that. I have mine set up as separate >>>>>>> channels on CentOS and they work independently. I would try out the >>>>>>> Solaris >>>>>>> if I had the time, but I don’t. I also don’t know Solaris really all >>>>>>> that >>>>>>> much, hopefully someone else can chime in. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [image: >>>>>>> https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/pPQYWyEgd3U9tfRSLCOfyEAjztZRe-j4nPYRdMYrN6FGIZFJEo-O3D-nQ5mhhJA1aetmO-GtoGO7U3mYiw2fDUZIGYNtR5ifQ4hOE_g1rRE0sUqsJlk] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Ethan Bonick** | Information Technology * >>>>>>> *TruQua* >>>>>>> Mobile 630.445.9313 >>>>>>> Office 312.525.8790 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *CONFIDENTIAL: *This e-mail and any attachments are confidential >>>>>>> and may be protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended >>>>>>> recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of >>>>>>> this e-mail or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this >>>>>>> e-mail in error, please reply and notify the sender and delete this copy >>>>>>> from your system. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto: >>>>>>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Daryl Rose >>>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, November 13, 2014 10:56 AM >>>>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [Spacewalk-list] How to properly setup Solaris >>>>>>> Channels >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ethan, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> To answer your questions, yes. Yes, I ran the rhn_check -vv on the >>>>>>> client server, and yes the server had checked in. So, the updates >>>>>>> channel >>>>>>> was a child of the base, so when I re-registered the client, it should >>>>>>> have >>>>>>> known about the child because it was part of the activation key. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've since blown away the base channel and the child channel and >>>>>>> combined everything into a single channel. I know see that there are >>>>>>> over >>>>>>> 900 updates available, which should be pretty accurate, however, I don't >>>>>>> like all of patches and packages intermixed. It makes it difficult to >>>>>>> figure out whats what. however, that is how the CentOS channel is, all >>>>>>> three repositories combined into a single large list, so maybe I just >>>>>>> have >>>>>>> to get used to it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Daryl >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Ethan Bonick < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Have you run an rhn_check or has the server checked in get to get >>>>>>> the new channel config? My guess would be it doesn't know about the >>>>>>> channel >>>>>>> yet. When you re-registered did you make sure the child channel is >>>>>>> subscribed to by the base channel? I know some of it is low level and >>>>>>> you >>>>>>> might have checked already, but never hurts to ask. Also did you remove >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> repo or just the channel? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Ethan Bonick | *Information Technology >>>>>>> *TruQua* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *CONFIDENTIAL: *This e-mail and any attachments are confidential >>>>>>> and may be protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended >>>>>>> recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of >>>>>>> this e-mail or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this >>>>>>> e-mail in error, please reply and notify the sender and delete this copy >>>>>>> from your system. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Daryl Rose <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> When I initially setup Solaris, I did just a single channel just for >>>>>>> patches. However, I decided that I want to also have a base channel as >>>>>>> well. Currently, if I want to add a new package to a Solaris server, I >>>>>>> have to either pop a dvd into the drive, or NFS an ISO image. However, >>>>>>> this is what SW is for. A repository of all of the packages, plus >>>>>>> updates >>>>>>> that may need to be applied. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I made a new base channel and imported all of the installation >>>>>>> packages into it. However, I already had an update channel with a >>>>>>> system >>>>>>> assigned to it. What I am trying to figure out is; what is the correct >>>>>>> way >>>>>>> to set up the two channels? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I removed the updates channel, and recreated it as a child of the >>>>>>> base channel. I had previously removed the subscribed system, so I >>>>>>> resubscribed to the base channel. There are over 2000 packages in the >>>>>>> base >>>>>>> channel, and 381 in the updates channel. I thought that once I >>>>>>> resubscribed the server to the base/child updates channel, I would see >>>>>>> needed updates. I know that there should be 80 updates needed on this >>>>>>> server, however, SW tells me that the system is up to date. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> When I setup the CentOS Channel, I created three repositories: >>>>>>> Base, Updates and Extra's. All three are then assigned to the CentOS >>>>>>> channel. There are now over 8000 packages available for the CentOS >>>>>>> server. Is best practice to put *ALL *base packages and updates >>>>>>> together in a single channel so that way the Solaris server can see >>>>>>> everything? Why doesn't the client server see the child channel and SW >>>>>>> tell me that it needs updates? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Daryl >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Spacewalk-list mailing list >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Spacewalk-list mailing list >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Spacewalk-list mailing list >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Spacewalk-list mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Spacewalk-list mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Spacewalk-list mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Spacewalk-list mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Spacewalk-list mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >> > >
_______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
