I have a couple of test servers where I am sharing the httpd server by setting ip address for the ”other” services.
So each server has 2 ip addresses, the spacewalk confs are named zz-etc so they will be read after all the others, I then change the “others” from *:80, *.443 to for example 1.1.1.2:80 and 1.1.1.2:443 I leave the spacewalk confs with *, and it seems to work, but I have not deployed this in our production environment, there is more testing to be done. Yesterday for example I discovered an “other” service that expected to use 127..0.0.1 for example, but it was fixed by simply adding a VirtualHost line with 127.0.0.1:80, so far so good. regards, and I hope I haven’t misunderstood your question. …C From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lachlan Musicman Sent: den 7 mars 2016 06:10 To: [email protected] Subject: [Spacewalk-list] Spacewalk as Virtual Host? Hi, We have installed Spacewalk on a "utilities" server, and I would like to change Spacewalk to a virtualhost set up in Apache2 so we can serve a number of services through Apache2 (Icinga, etc). The only advice I've found is an email from this list - but it's now 6 years old. https://www.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/2010-February/msg00206.html Do people still recommend against it? cheers L. ------ The most dangerous phrase in the language is, "We've always done it this way." - Grace Hopper
_______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
