Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thoughts?
I'd promote T_MPART_ALT_DIFF_99 as it stands. I have a hunch we could get another 1% spam hits by working on the comparison algorithm. Maybe compare the T_MPART_ALT_DIFF_99 FPs with the T_MPART_ALT_DIFF_95 FPs. Daniel -- Daniel Quinlan anti-spam (SpamAssassin), Linux, http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/ and open source consulting
