Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Oh, and before Dan gives me crap for changing the rendering code like > this -- I did check that the common mail client we code against > displays things the same way. ie:
I might have asked whether that was the case, but for future reference, the change didn't really trigger any "must give Theo crap" impulses. > text/plain, text/x-aol, text/html => text/html > text/plain, text/html => text/html > text/plain, text/x-aol => text/plain > text, text/html => text/html > text, text/x-aol => text Hmmm... do people use SpamAssassin on AOL email? On http://postmaster.aol.com/guidelines/html.html it says that using the MIME Type text/x-aol that AOL 5.0 AOL can read the following "RTF" formatting. BREAK: BR FONT: FONT BOLD: B ITALICS: I UNDERLINE: U SUBSCRIPT: SUB SUPERSCRIPT: SUP BIG: BIG SMALL: SMALL HEADER: H1, H2, H3 PARAGRAPH: P BODY: BODY HYPERLINK: A CENTER: CENTER STRONG: STRONG Versions of AOL greater than AOL 6.0 can apparently read text/html. AOL 5.0 is pretty ancient, so I'm not sure whether we should bother rendering the x-aol part of "text, text/x-aol" as HTML or not. The other cases, I agree that we should just ignore it -- it seems like an old newsletter "optimization" for AOL 5.0 people. Daniel
