http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3049
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-23 10:39 ------- Subject: Re: Implement sa-learn --loaddb dumpfile functionality On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 10:29:13AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >+1 given the current parameters of the solution: > > > > --dump backup dumps not human-unfriendly text-format backup > > --restore restores a backup > > - -1: I don't think we should have a multi-case --dump switch: > > --dump : human-readable dump as now > --dump backup : human and machine-readable dump for backup > > IMO, that's going to be crufty, supporting both a 0-argument > and 1-argument switch. (-D in spamassassin is an example: messy). > I suggest we create a new switch for this representation. > > --backup? I'm fine with this, I was just trying to cut down on the number of command line arguments we had. We already support a 0/1 argument switch for dump (ie --dump, --dump all, --dump magic, --dump data). It's easy enough to just have another command line param for backup. Michael ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
