http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3064
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-01 11:15 ------- > you're view is a little bit off here. "use_bayes" tells the SA code > to not use the Bayes code, any Bayes DBs, etc. It's an on/off flag > for the whole thing. As part of that of course, rules and > autolearning are disabled since the whole thing is being disabled. I was talking about how and why *users* use the option and *not* how it works in the code. They are two different things, as evidenced by the amount of confusion and consternation that the current implementation causes. > Well, the other problem with this, of course, is that this is great > for us, but what about the people who use our modules directly? I, > for instance, have code that calls M::SA->learn() directly. Should > that work if the config says "use_bayes 0"? IMO, it's up to the > modules to check, not my calling code. I agree that the configuration should be what matters, but I think having separate options for learning and checking (at least) would be useful and a major improvement. Nobody has recently suggested that we have any command-line options override these settings. > So far we're -1.9 and +2, fyi. I'm leaning more to a -1 now, actually. > So make that -2 and +2 overall. Note that any -1 is a veto for a code modification. I don't think we're at the point where voting is meaningful yet. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
