-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Duncan Findlay writes: >On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 05:28:48PM -0800, Daniel Quinlan wrote: >> sabat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>=20 >> > To me, it seems like the msg id should always be there, since it's >> > there when spamd announces that it's working on a message. But I >> > didn't want to break anything, so it's an option. :-) >>=20 >> Sounds good to me. However, rather than a set of options, would a >> format string be better? > >I'd prefer not. The problem with format strings is that the messages >could be pretty much any format, which makes logcheck filters, etc >kinda tough to do. I don't really see the value with having that. me neither. - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFAQ/UDQTcbUG5Y7woRAnuiAJ4mIjYf9tt5z2HXsn+c/j2RY6uDYwCff7dL kvSgtgtST7aJDl1yvVh5IK4= =wU1v -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
