http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2912
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-11 19:20 ------- Subject: Re: RFE: allow test order to be controlling using a test 'priority' setting > Ok, decision time. I'm getting a 7-10% slowdown with the code I've > got written now, with two sets of priorities (0 and 1000). I need to > double check the results of a mass-check to make sure it's running all > of the tests correctly, then I'll post another patch. I don't see us > getting more speed out of the loop over priorities approach, but > welcome input on ways it can be made better. Are you generating any data that's not used for either of the priorities? AWL, for example, doesn't need any body-type data. > BTW, I see this, well the fact that AWL does not run after all other > tests, as a showstopper for 3.0.0. Are we stuck on the assign > priorities to tests approach? I think it's the right approach. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
