http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2912
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-11 20:47 ------- Subject: Re: RFE: allow test order to be controlling using a test 'priority' setting I agree with Justin about profiling. I think we might need to take another look at the evalstr caching stuff and the function-calling looping etc. done from PerMsgStatus::check(). I'm not 100% sure we're still using it and I'm not sure why we can't figure out a way to cache stuff even with user defined rules. (We could dictate that user defined rules always run at a higher priority, for one thing.) ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
