-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Daniel Quinlan writes:
>Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> The issue here is -- should mass-check be de-encapsulating this mail?
>> It wasn't encapped by *your* SpamAssassin installation. hmm.
>>
>> Anyone got ideas on how to handle this?
>
>I think mass-check shouldn't be de-encapsulating email that wasn't
>encapsulated locally.  A regular expression based on the checking host
>name seems like the way to go, something that can be stored in a
>configuration file.

yeah -- and defaulting to "deencapsulate all if unset" for backwards
compat.

>Obviously, de-encapsulation should never be done in a normal check.

agreed.

- --j.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS

iD8DBQFAYiH2QTcbUG5Y7woRAqkIAKCLD/HstBYBDXcAN7CnSk40v0pXaACggmer
jfGo7Ajwf5AVYYgOVm4ZzOk=
=Gpxt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to