http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3096
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-27 15:55 ------- > Is nobody going to comment on this?? -0.5 not quite ready yet The patch really needs to fix all of the scripts in masses to handle the new format, including the ones under rule-qa. I agree with using a single output file, but I'd like the new format (the format not the code itself) to be sufficient to handle: - message classes other than spam and ham (both for the manual classification as well as the result determined by SpamAssassin). - using "unknown" or "none" for unclassified checks (like "./mass-check --mbox file.mbox" with no --spam or --ham argument or class specification. I propose the following format: <manual class> <result class> <score> <id> <rules> <value pairs> where, for our current code, <manual class> is: "spam" | "ham" | "none" and <result class> is: "spam" | "ham" I'd also change the score to be the precise floating point score while we're at it (that, at least, should be an easy change). ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
