http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3096
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-27 18:54 ------- Subject: Re: [review] improve mass-check so that it can be run from a different directory > -0.5 not quite ready yet True. > The patch really needs to fix all of the scripts in masses to handle the > new format, including the ones under rule-qa. I plan on re-writing most of the other scripts (I'm part way there). But as far as rule-qa, I'll probably need some help sorting through it. > I propose the following format: > > <manual class> <result class> <score> <id> <rules> <value pairs> > > where, for our current code, <manual class> is: > > "spam" | "ham" | "none" > > and <result class> is: > > "spam" | "ham" I'd prefer that we stick with single characters, since that is what ArchiveIterator does. (It passes "s" or "h" around instead of "spam" or "ham") Furthermore, having it fixed width is a good thing imho. > I'd also change the score to be the precise floating point score while > we're at it (that, at least, should be an easy change). Agreed, but all the scripts need to change too. Since I'm rewriting them to share code, that won't be hard. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
