-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Daniel Quinlan writes: > Bear in mind these comparisons only work for rules with names that > haven't changed. I did say at the time that renaming would cause these problems ;) > 0.607 1.1867 0.0267 0.978 0.87 0.58 HTML_TABLE_THICK_BORD:1 > 0.470 0.9134 0.0267 0.972 0.85 0.58 HTML_TABLE_THICK_BORD:2 > > a bit disconcerting Could be that the thick borders were from a single spammer, and they've changed their design a little. > 0.380 0.7601 0.0000 1.000 0.93 0.45 LOTS_OF_STUFF:1 > 0.043 0.0867 0.0000 1.000 0.93 0.45 LOTS_OF_STUFF:2 > > bad very very wierd. > 1.024 2.0401 0.0067 0.997 0.92 2.53 TRACKER_ID:1 > 0.814 1.6201 0.0067 0.996 0.92 2.53 TRACKER_ID:2 > > bad almost definitely evasion. - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFAhEknQTcbUG5Y7woRAktuAJ9Rbf+FfzLqtHRb2vrKct6CfvJg0QCgtuH9 g74H0W3PY5VPgrkxtMAC0q4= =Hqya -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
