On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 02:02:11PM -0700, Dan Quinlan wrote:
>  14.644  29.1953   0.0734    0.997   0.96    1.06  MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET:1
>  20.134  38.8626   1.3818    0.966   0.89    1.06  MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET:2
> 
> This one is probably a bug.

All valid ham hits for me.

>   2.959   5.7470   0.1669    0.972   0.86    0.19  MIME_BASE64_NO_NAME:1
>   3.042   5.7804   0.3004    0.951   0.81    0.19  MIME_BASE64_NO_NAME:2
> 
> could be a minor parsing issue

All valid hits for me.  All newsletters.  Most are from FoodTV --
multipart/alternate with text/plain and text/html... for some reason,
both parts are b64 encoded.  I also had a newsletter with an attached
GIF w/ no name.

>   0.864   1.7134   0.0134    0.992   0.91    1.59  MIME_HTML_MOSTLY:1
>   0.977   1.9201   0.0334    0.983   0.88    1.59  MIME_HTML_MOSTLY:2
> 
> nah

My only ham hit is valid.  Comes from a feedback response from Intuit:
m/a message with a blank text/plain part, and a few lines in the
text/html part.


From my POV, it just looks like we do more accurate parsing now, so
therefore the rule hits change.  If they go down in rank/etc, well,
there you go.

-- 
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"Anyone know of a buffer cleaning program for Linux?
  Netscape! (from the back of the room)" - Aeleen Frisch at LISA '99

Attachment: pgp9NkFsIxJz9.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to