-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Daniel Quinlan writes: > It seems like a huge improvement across the board. There are a few > small slips, but do we care? It does look very nice to me. Would it be possible to have *both*? Namely one set of rules (with high scores) for the -firsttrusted case, and another for the non - -firsttrusted case (with lower scores). The latter are very good for catching spam via mailing lists, for example. Regarding changing the check_rbl() API for "-untrusted" etc. Please leave compat code in for "foo-untrusted" et al, because those are used by third-party rules files as far as I know; it's been a public API for quite a while. - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFAslPbQTcbUG5Y7woRAmhoAKCAy63dDHf5I0VEs00EvUOh8SgoMwCbBSCQ MVeND2PUnnRM5lriKyxX2HQ= =jOPD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
