[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) writes: > Would it be possible to have *both*? Namely one set of rules (with > high scores) for the -firsttrusted case, and another for the non - > -firsttrusted case (with lower scores). The latter are very good for > catching spam via mailing lists, for example.
Ugh, what a can of worms. I'm not sure there will be enough hits of the latter type to get good scores from the perceptron. The S/O ratio for the latter type is also much lower once you subtract out the -firsttrusted hits in a correctly configured setting (counting Michael Parker as misconfigured, although I'm not sure whether it's a trusted networks guessing problem that we should be able to guess or not, but we're currently not guessing his trusted networks right). Daniel -- Daniel Quinlan http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/
