http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3429
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-05-26 15:03 ------- Lets use Ratio*Wide criteria. >new > > 0.000000-0.006738 39.485 > 0.006738-0.018316 0.159 <- thin > 0.018316-0.049787 0.441 <- thin > 0.049787-0.135335 0.258 <- thin They are thin (small Ratio) but they can have strong Wide (popularity, frequency) > 0.135335-0.367879 0.352 <- thin > 0.367879-0.632121 4.717 > 0.632121-0.864665 1.511 > 0.864665-0.950213 0.960 > 0.950213-0.981684 0.779 > 0.981684-0.993262 0.697 > 0.993262-1.000000 50.641 >I think some of the ranges are too empty. Let's try: >0 to exp(-8) >exp(-4) to exp(-2) >exp(-2) to exp(-1) >exp(-1) to 1-exp(-1) >1-exp(-1) to 1-exp(-2) >1-exp(-2) to 1-exp(-4) >1-exp(-4) to 1-exp(-8) >1-exp(-8) to 1 > 0.000000-0.000335 39.046 > 0.000335-0.018316 0.598 > 0.018316-0.135335 0.699 > 0.135335-0.367879 0.352 > 0.367879-0.632121 4.717 > 0.632121-0.864665 1.511 > 0.864665-0.981684 1.739 > 0.981684-0.999665 2.450 > 0.999665-1.000000 48.888 >That's better. Maybe we could... I dont think that its better.... We should Sum all Ratio * Wide for every row and search combination that maximize the Sum ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
