http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3429
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-05-27 11:33 ------- >we already have criteria. >We use the S/O ratio (spam/overall = spam/(ham+spam) using a 50/50 >weighting of ham to spam so the weighting is constant). High is good >for spam rules. Low is good for ham rules. >We also use a RANK number which is a relative ranking system of each >rule compared to every other rule. RANK - is simple sorting by other criteries? >We also use the hit rate. SPAM% for spam rules and HAM% for ham rules. Thank you for criteria! We have 3 coefficient - R/0, HitRate and Overlap What about Potencial Forging? Lets speak about R/0, HitRate What should be R/0 and HitRate for new rule, that rule will be accepted? Can we public formula R/0*HitRate > something to accept new rules? Where users can found R/0 and HitRates for all rules? At page http://www.spamassassin.org/tests.html I see only scores. Can we public corpus size, number on hams/spams, and R/0 ratio and HitRate for every rule on this page? Thank you? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
