http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3142
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-05-27 10:16 ------- Ok, that makes sense to me. I'm personally not opposed to this enhancement but I don't like the name of the procol "command" and the switch though: -> The command: The other alternatives to PROCESS do process the messages, too, though they aren't called PROCESS_FOO. And _XHDR is a bit confusing to me :) What about simply HEADERS? -> The switch: -X looks like an extended version of -x which does something completely different. Unfortunately is -H already used. I'd suggest -Y but while I thought about it, I had the idea that it could make sense to have a command TAGS, too, which just returns the tags you can use in the headers (ie. YESNO, HITS, PREVIEW etc.) in some way. For that -Y would make more sense and should be reserved. Maybe -Z or -z (as the successor of -y) could be used? Oh, and the ASF is the Apache Software Foundation (of which SpamAssassin is now part of) and CLA stands for Contributor License Agreement, see http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
