http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3142
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-05-28 04:12 ------- Subject: Re: spamc/spamd protocol enhancement > Ok, that makes sense to me. I'm personally not opposed to this enhancement but > I don't like the name of the procol "command" and the switch though: > > -> The command: The other alternatives to PROCESS do process the messages, > too, though they aren't called PROCESS_FOO. And _XHDR is a bit confusing to > me :) What about simply HEADERS? HEADERS - ok :) > -> The switch: -X looks like an extended version of -x which does something > completely different. Unfortunately is -H already used. > > I'd suggest -Y but while I thought about it, I had the idea that it could make > sense to have a command TAGS, too, which just returns the tags you can use in > the headers (ie. YESNO, HITS, PREVIEW etc.) in some way. For that -Y would > make more sense and should be reserved. Maybe -Z or -z (as the successor of > -y) could be used? Ok, choose -z or -Z according to your preferences :) > Oh, and the ASF is the Apache Software Foundation (of which SpamAssassin is > now part of) and CLA stands for Contributor License Agreement, see > http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas Oh..., good trouble. :))) ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
