http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3417
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-05-27 11:18 ------- >I should add, thanks a lot for contributing the bug and the code. I hope >this hasn't deterred you from making future contributions. :-) Possibly has. :) The Problem is that I dont undestand your criteria for accepting new rules. :( This should be a mathematical criteria, statistical formula and then contributers like me can check new rules and contribute them after statistical checking. It cant for example Wide*Ratio as I defined. Or Wide*Ratio*PotencialForging Or Wide*Ratio*PotencialForging*Correlation May be something other... But it must be the formula, not words "the rule should not be sucks" NOW I dont undestand why you use some rules and reject other... ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
