http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3417
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-05-27 13:35 ------- Subject: Re: New Rule: Checking sender IP against MX records From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Many hacked servers have IPs, that not exists in any mx records of any > domain. Spamers use the nets of thousands hacked computers to send > spam. > > My rule can be forged easily as SPF rule, that included as plugin. No. We have some SPF whitelist rules with very very very low scores (and they may be removed), but the only rules with appreciable scores are positive (not whitelist) and are working increasingly well over time. > Could you tell me R/0 of BAYES_00,BAYES_01,BAYES_05,BAYES_10, > BAYES_25, AWL (AWL < -1), RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED,HABEAS_USER and > SPF_CHECK (ham rules) on your big corpus? You can look this up yourself. Follow the link to collated results from the hacking on SpamAssassin web page. I don't mind answering questions, but I need to be clear, your MX rule is not going into SpamAssassin. This is my last comment on this bug. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
