Sidney Markowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I would like to see the fix for 3571 checked in along with my 
> spamd_ssl.t test case first, but I won't vote against a pre2 release if 
> everyone wants to go ahead without 3571 in there.

We can easily fix this after pre2.  There's going to be another set of
mass-checks and at least a pre3, so there's no reason to delay pre2 for
this patch.

-- 
Daniel Quinlan
http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/

Reply via email to