On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 06:29:08PM -0700, Dan Quinlan wrote:
> We can easily fix this after pre2.  There's going to be another set of
> mass-checks and at least a pre3, so there's no reason to delay pre2 for
> this patch.

BTW: I just moved 3359 to the 3.0.0 queue since it just got a patch sent
in.  I think it should be applied before the mass-checks are announced
since it fixes an issue with "mass-check -j 1".  Interestingly, that's
the only place it'll have a problem in our code.  <G>

-- 
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works." - Eric Crampton

Attachment: pgpwHWrKSXR9A.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to