Please use the -dev list for development discussion. ;-) I agree: 1,2,3. Why? I think TCR of 50 is probably still too low, so I'm looking more at the FP rates.
- Daniel Henry Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Rank by order of preference: > 1: 0.0461%, 5.3556%, 11.6994 > 2: 0.0544%, 4.9949%, 12.0490 > 3: 0.0648%, 4.6278%, 12.2817 > > I vote 1,2,3. > > No stat. sig. difference in TCR between 1,2. > No stat. sig. difference in TCR between 2,3. > > There were no stat. sig. differences between the performance old > perceptron with the range_lo bug and the new one, so it must not have > been a big deal. > > Parameters: > 1: -t 4.0 -p 2.0 > 2: -t 4.125 -p 2.0 > 3: -t 4.25 -p 2.0 > > I'm going to generate the scores for all three and post them at > http://stern.cs.dal.ca/sa-3.0/ [...] Will someone post whichever one > that wins the vote to bugzilla and commit the scores/stats to SVN? > [...] > Henry > > P.S. Don't peek at the statistics files in the gen-set0 directories > until you've cast your vote based on the 10fcv results. There will be a > reasonable amount of variance in results on the test set between the > runs because each of the gen-set0 results are generated using a diffrent > random partitioning (and you'd only be looking at one sample!). -- Daniel Quinlan http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/
