-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Theo Van Dinter writes: > On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 11:18:50AM -0700, Dan Quinlan wrote: > > I agree: 1,2,3. Why? I think TCR of 50 is probably still too low, so > > I'm looking more at the FP rates. > Ditto on 1, 2, 3. For set0, the FP rate is the main issue IMO. <aol>. so let's apply #1 ;) - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFA/am6QTcbUG5Y7woRAtazAJ9Gqb0volgldD3jJVgUQ0AYac4gewCgst9q EOpDp9ZAgng0Sk/Ls36tNv0= =bAqp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
