Daniel Quinlan wrote: >> Okay, here's my proposal for official daily updates for 3.0:
Fred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Would be possible to include the work of SARE in this process. The use of > nightly corpus test system would help validate if our rules are good, > perceptron could assign scores, we're still active just not very noisy. It's definitely possible for some (most?) SARE work: - those rule sets we *can* use (clear authorship and the ASF needs Contributor License Agreements) - this would probably focus on non-heavyweight, cleanly designed, high-accuracy, etc. rule sets We use SARE ideas *quite* often now, but we use SARE code (rules) less often, unfortunately. That's usually because it takes a lot of time to rewrite rules when we must because we don't have permission to use them or for technical reasons. Only a few of our current committers do the vast majority of rule development and integration, so we are a bit resource constrained. Daniel -- Daniel Quinlan http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/
