-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Robert Menschel writes:
> Tuesday, August 24, 2004, 7:02:00 PM, you wrote:
> JM> That's the main issue that we had in the past with "external"
> JM> rulesets -- most of those were developed without measuring accuracy,
> JM> and once tested they don't come out too hot.  But from what I can see
> JM> (from outside) it looks like you all have been doing that for a
> JM> while, which is cool.
> 
> Yes.  We post the rules to each other, run them through two or more
> (usually three) corpora, and use the combined results to determine
> whether rules are viable. (We're hoping to add a fourth corpus soon.)
> 
> Viable to us is less strict than viable to the development team, lower
> thresholds, but the basic philosophies are the same, I think.

Yep, from what I can see, agreed ;)

> JM> (BTW I should qualify what Daniel means by "non-heavyweight" -- in
> JM> other words, the rule doesn't greatly affect speed/RAM usage.  I
> JM> think that's what he means at least.)
> 
> Also important to us.  My system, for instance, does a comprehensive
> mass-check on a single rule to dozens of rules in about half an hour. If
> any rule causes a noticeable jump in this performance measure, we either
> fix it or toss it.
> 
> (I can't really measure RAM usage on my system, but the same concern
> applies.)
> 
> We've also been trying to some extent to document a rule's history, so we
> know whether it came from a CLA member or elsewhere. We're discussing
> ways of making that more formal.

The version 2 Apache license has some text allowed "trivial" contributions
to not require CLAs -- but then, what's the definition of "trivial"? we
haven't got a really good definition of that as it applies to rules yet,
unfortunately ;)

> JM> If we can work something out, that'll be great ;)
> 
> We're all agreed about that.  I'm hopeful we can.

cool.

- --j.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS

iD8DBQFBLVedQTcbUG5Y7woRAoR2AKDibOVadoq72mOsUiSRc1eMVM2SEwCfU312
iiAoHwRTNkPlN0RX/yODUU0=
=VPad
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to