On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 06:30:08PM +0100, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote: > Exactly, which is why I, on my own lists, always set a reply-to to the list if > there's no reply-to set already; meaning that unless the sender says otherwise > the reply goes to the list, just as he wants it to.
Hint: Broken autoresponders + Reply-To-List munging = mail loops. And with mailing lists, the worst-hit entities in this scenario are the mailing list server itself -- and the list owner. 8-) This, incidentally, is one of the reasons SF doesn't allow Reply-To munging: <http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=6693&group_id=1> - Adrian ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk