At 01:48 PM 11/27/03 -0800, Greg Webster wrote:
An example header:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=9.0 required=5.0 tests=BIZ_TLD,CLICK_BELOW,
     DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX,HTML_50_60,HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE,HTML_MESSAGE,
        HTTP_EXCESSIVE_ESCAPES,MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET,MIME_HTML_ONLY,
        PENIS_ENLARGE,WLS_URI_3823,WLS_URI_3861 autolearn=no
version=2.60

'grep bayes /etc/mail/spamassassin/local/cf`:
use_bayes                               1
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam      0.5
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam         7.5
bayes_auto_learn                        1

Any ideas what I've done wrong?

One of two things could be the issue.


1) as far as autolearning is concerned the score of this email is NOT 9.0.. Autolearning is based on the score of the email as if bayes was disabled, which includes using a different scoreset. The set0/1 score may not be over 7.5..

2) autolearning is an opportunistic thing, and if there's a conflict getting a lock to the bayes database, autolearning will be skipped.



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to