Heya! On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 07:27, Matt Kettler wrote: > At 01:48 PM 11/27/03 -0800, Greg Webster wrote: > >An example header: > >X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=9.0 required=5.0 tests=BIZ_TLD,CLICK_BELOW, > > DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX,HTML_50_60,HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE,HTML_MESSAGE, > > HTTP_EXCESSIVE_ESCAPES,MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET,MIME_HTML_ONLY, > > PENIS_ENLARGE,WLS_URI_3823,WLS_URI_3861 autolearn=no > >version=2.60 > > > >'grep bayes /etc/mail/spamassassin/local/cf`: > >use_bayes 1 > >bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam 0.5 > >bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 7.5 > >bayes_auto_learn 1 > > > >Any ideas what I've done wrong? > > One of two things could be the issue. > > 1) as far as autolearning is concerned the score of this email is NOT 9.0.. > Autolearning is based on the score of the email as if bayes was disabled, > which includes using a different scoreset. The set0/1 score may not be over > 7.5..
No Bayes scores are listed in the header above, so I assume the 'real' score is 9.0. Is there something else that may be affecting the 'real' score? > 2) autolearning is an opportunistic thing, and if there's a conflict > getting a lock to the bayes database, autolearning will be skipped. I've checked through ~20 emails that have a score above the threshhold and all of them have autolearn=no. Thanks, Greg -- Greg Webster - [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Touch Software Corporation Ph: (604)278-0515 - Fax: (604)608-3112 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
