At 10:19 AM 1/23/2004, Mark Squire wrote:
Hi all,
I have been training SA manually for a couple of weeks now.  I estimate
a good 2000 emails for both Spam and Ham have been learned by it.
Coupla questions though . . . I want to put it into auto-learn mode
because I have only trained it on a few of our employees emails, and not
people from the whole company.  I think that SA needs to "get out more"
and learn from a broader range of emails (if that makes sense).  I
wanted to be sure that it is okay to put it into auto-learn mode, even
after I have been manually teaching it for a while.  What do you good
folks think?

Auto-learning is not mutually exclusive with manual training. In fact, if you are using auto learning, you SHOULD use manual training as well.


Auto learning alone does NOT work, and will over time result in a pretty skewed bayes database. It needs some manual training as well.

However, autolearning is quite useful, it's just not good enough to be used without ever training manually





-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to