Does this look better?
0.1 HTML_60_70 BODY: Message is 60% to 70% HTML
0.1 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
5.4 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 0.9901]
1.2 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_02 BODY: HTML: images with 0-200 bytes of words
2.0 MRWIGGLY Mr. Wiggly enhance drug spam.
I'm surprised at that html-tag-balance line. MrWiggly usually doesn't screw
up his html. Maybe the message got corrupted?
Loren
----- Original Message -----
From: "JR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 10:02 AM
Subject: Bad Bayes! No Cookie!
>
> Wah! BAYES_00 on Mr Wiggly?? That's not right!
>
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_50_60,
> HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_02,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY,MRWIGGLY,
> SUBJ_BUY autolearn=no version=2.63
>
> Do y'all leave the default score for BAYES_00? Or do you have it scored up
> higher so it doesn't shoot you in the foot like this? Any suggestions on
> what to score it up to in order to avoid this?
>
> Thx.
>
> --JR
>
>
>
