spamassassin-users  

Messages by Date

• 2004/08/05 RE: Syncing domains in email to prevent being seen as "phishing" Daulton, Douglas
• 2004/08/05 Upgrading issues with 2.64 SAtalk Mail User
• 2004/08/05 SA 2.64 sa-learn warning messages Paolo Cravero as2594
• 2004/08/05 Re: SpamAssassin 3.0.0-pre4 - Load Problems Michael Parker
• 2004/08/05 Re: 2 questions Johann Spies
• 2004/08/05 Re: How to stop porn spam Steve Bertrand
• 2004/08/05 RE: 2 questions Steve Bertrand
• 2004/08/05 [OT] Brief funny Chris Santerre
• 2004/08/05 Re: Syncing domains in email to prevent being seen as "phishing" Keith C. Ivey
• 2004/08/05 RE: 2 questions Kern, Tom
• 2004/08/05 Re: Request for information about bayesian filter Nicki Messerschmidt
• 2004/08/05 SpamAssassin 3.0.0-pre4 - Load Problems Jeff Koch
• 2004/08/05 Re: SpamAssassin 2.64 is released! Jeff Chan
• 2004/08/05 Re: Whitelisting or trusting a SquirrelMail frontend... Cirelle Enterprises
• 2004/08/05 Re: Which IPs are checked for spam? Nicki Messerschmidt
• 2004/08/05 ANNOUNCE: Mail::SpamAssassin::SpamCopURI 0.21 Jeff Chan
• 2004/08/05 Re: Request for information about bayesian filter Nicki Messerschmidt
• 2004/08/05 applying spam identification with bayes and SA WalyBaly
• 2004/08/05 SpamAssassin and unicode Eugene Morozov
• 2004/08/05 How to stop porn spam Eugene Morozov
• 2004/08/05 ANNOUNCE: Additional data sources added to ws.surbl.org Jeff Chan
• 2004/08/04 whitelist_from_rcvd ? Per Jessen
• 2004/08/04 Re: Syncing domains in email to prevent being seen as "phishing" John Andersen
• 2004/08/04 Re: SpamAssassin 2.64 is released! Daniel Quinlan
• 2004/08/04 Re: Request for information about bayesian filter Robert Menschel
• 2004/08/04 Re: SpamAssassin 2.64 is released! jdow
• 2004/08/04 Re: SA3: DNSBLs stop working? Daniel Quinlan
• 2004/08/04 SA3: DNSBLs stop working? Jay Levitt
• 2004/08/04 SpamAssassin 2.64 is released! jm
• 2004/08/04 SpamAssassin 3.0.0-pre4 is released! Justin Mason
• 2004/08/04 Re: Which IPs are checked for spam? Matt Kettler
• 2004/08/04 Re: Do we need to patch razor2.61 ? Matt Kettler
• 2004/08/04 Re: SA Logo Contest !! AMAZING!! Steven Dickenson
• 2004/08/04 RE: more are more junk getting through Kurt Buff
• 2004/08/04 Do we need to patch razor2.61 ? Roger Thomas
• 2004/08/04 Re: SA Logo Contest !! AMAZING!! jdow
• 2004/08/04 Re: more are more junk getting through jdow
• 2004/08/04 Whitelisting or trusting a SquirrelMail frontend... Henry Kwan
• 2004/08/04 RE: SA Logo Contest !! AMAZING!! Kelson Vibber
• 2004/08/04 RE: SA Logo Contest !! AMAZING!! Andy Jezierski
• 2004/08/04 RE: spamd Matt Linzbach
• 2004/08/04 Re: Request for information about bayesian filter Jim Maul
• 2004/08/04 spamd Kern, Tom
• 2004/08/04 Re: Request for information about bayesian filter Matt Kettler
• 2004/08/04 Re: SA Logo Contest !! AMAZING!! Dimitrios
• 2004/08/04 SA Gateway + Exchange + IMAP = Fun with SPAM Mike French
• 2004/08/04 RE: SpamAssassin SPF? Matt Kettler
• 2004/08/04 RE: SpamAssassin SPF? Matthew.van.Eerde
• 2004/08/04 Re: 2 questions Jim Maul
• 2004/08/04 Request for information about bayesian filter Nicki Messerschmidt
• 2004/08/04 Which IPs are checked for spam? Nicki Messerschmidt
• 2004/08/04 SpamAssassin SPF? Matthew.van.Eerde
• 2004/08/04 Re: 2 questions Steve Bertrand
• 2004/08/04 Re: Can Spamassassin identify spam from DSL or Cable? Matt Kettler
• 2004/08/04 RE: 2 questions Kern, Tom
• 2004/08/04 Re: 2 questions Matt Kettler
• 2004/08/04 Re: 2 questions Steve Bertrand
• 2004/08/04 Re: Time to update the 419 rules...? Justin Mason
• 2004/08/04 2 questions Kern, Tom
• 2004/08/04 Re: Can Spamassassin identify spam from DSL or Cable? Ryan Moore
• 2004/08/04 Re: AWL headache... E. Falk
• 2004/08/04 Re: Time to update the 419 rules? Vermyndax
• 2004/08/04 RE: more are more junk getting through Jim Maul
• 2004/08/04 Re: SA Logo Contest !! AMAZING!! Scott Blomquist
• 2004/08/04 RE: Time to update the 419 rules...? Pierre Thomson
• 2004/08/04 Re: make tests fail Anne Ramey
• 2004/08/04 Re: rewrite_header not working Steve Suhre
• 2004/08/04 Re: AWL headache... Kris Deugau
• 2004/08/04 RE: SpamAssassin -- the O'Reilly book Chris Santerre
• 2004/08/04 Re: AWL headache... E. Falk
• 2004/08/04 RE: SpamAssassin -- the O'Reilly book Steve Dimoff
• 2004/08/04 RE: more are more junk getting through Kurt Buff
• 2004/08/04 RE: SA Logo Contest !! AMAZING!! Chris Santerre
• 2004/08/04 Re: AWL headache... Steve Bertrand
• 2004/08/04 Re: sa-lean --dump data Theo Van Dinter
• 2004/08/04 Can Spamassassin identify spam from DSL or Cable? Hou, Ming
• 2004/08/04 Time to update the 419 rules? Vermyndax
• 2004/08/04 Re: rewrite_header not working Ryan Thompson
• 2004/08/04 Time to update the 419 rules...? Vermyndax
• 2004/08/04 RE: spam block no To:user? Matthew.van.Eerde
• 2004/08/04 AWL headache... E. Falk
• 2004/08/04 Re: SA Logo Contest !! AMAZING!! Kelson Vibber
• 2004/08/04 RE: Syncing domains in email to prevent being seen as "phishing" Daulton, Douglas
• 2004/08/04 RE: SA Logo Contest !! AMAZING!! Darren Coleman
• 2004/08/04 RE: Does anyone have a rule for this kind of thing Chris Santerre
• 2004/08/04 RE: Does anyone have a rule for this kind of thing Matt Linzbach
• 2004/08/04 RE: SpamAssassin -- the O'Reilly book Chris Santerre
• 2004/08/04 RE: SA Logo Contest !! AMAZING!! Chris Santerre
• 2004/08/04 Re: Why only 2.3? Steve Bertrand
• 2004/08/04 RE: Why only 2.3? Chris Santerre
• 2004/08/04 RE: Syncing domains in email to prevent being seen as "phishing" Chris Santerre
• 2004/08/04 Re: Confused over Sorbs Matt Kettler
• 2004/08/04 Does anyone have a rule for this kind of thing Amnon
• 2004/08/04 spam block no To:user? Dave Stern - Former Rocket Scientist
• 2004/08/04 Re: Confused over Sorbs Jeff Chan
• 2004/08/04 Re: Confused over Sorbs John Andersen
• 2004/08/04 Confused over Sorbs Ron McKeating
• 2004/08/04 Re: No SURBL entries in logs? Johann Spies
• 2004/08/04 Re: SA Logo Contest !! AMAZING!! Nancy McGough
• 2004/08/03 Re: more are more junk getting through Marc Kool
• 2004/08/03 Re: Statistical methods for determining spam authorship (fwd) Justin Mason
• 2004/08/03 Re[2]: Increase this weekend? Robert Menschel
• 2004/08/03 Re: Statistical methods for determining spam authorship (fwd) John Andersen
• 2004/08/03 Re: Why only 2.3? Asif Iqbal
• 2004/08/03 Statistical methods for determining spam authorship (fwd) jm
• 2004/08/03 Re: more are more junk getting through jdow
• 2004/08/03 Re: Syncing domains in email to prevent being seen as "phishing" John Andersen
• 2004/08/03 Re: SA Logo Contest !! AMAZING!! John Andersen
• 2004/08/03 RE: more are more junk getting through Scot L. Harris
• 2004/08/03 notes from CEAS Justin Mason
• 2004/08/03 Re: Syncing domains in email to prevent being seen as "phishing" Justin Mason
• 2004/08/03 Re: Syncing domains in email to prevent being seen as "phishing" Jeff Chan
• 2004/08/03 Re: Why only 2.3? Jeff Chan
• 2004/08/03 Re: Increase this weekend? Jeff Chan
• 2004/08/03 Re: rewrite_header not working Steve Suhre
• 2004/08/03 Syncing domains in email to prevent being seen as "phishing" Daulton, Douglas
• 2004/08/03 Re: rewrite_header not working Ryan Thompson
• 2004/08/03 RE: more are more junk getting through Ryan Thompson
• 2004/08/03 Re: rewrite_header not working Steve Suhre
• 2004/08/03 Re: SA Logo Contest !! AMAZING!! Dimitrios
• 2004/08/03 RE: Why only 2.3? Daniel Quinlan
• 2004/08/03 Re: SA Logo Contest !! AMAZING!! Andy Jezierski
• 2004/08/03 Re: rewrite_header not working Matt Kettler
• 2004/08/03 Re: Compile errors with version 2.63 Albert Whale
• 2004/08/03 Re: rewrite_header not working Steve Suhre
• 2004/08/03 RE: Re[2]: Increase this weekend? Dan Kohn
• 2004/08/03 RE: SA Logo Contest !! AMAZING!! Matthew.van.Eerde
• 2004/08/03 Re: rewrite_header not working LuKreme
• 2004/08/03 RE: Why only 2.3? Bret Miller
• 2004/08/03 Re: SA Logo Contest !! AMAZING!! LuKreme
• 2004/08/03 RE: SpamAssassin -- the O'Reilly book Martin Devall
• 2004/08/03 Re: Compile errors with version 2.63 Tim Faircloth
• 2004/08/03 Re: more are more junk getting through LuKreme
• 2004/08/03 Re: rewrite_header not working Theo Van Dinter
• 2004/08/03 Re: SA Logo Contest !! AMAZING!! Marc Kool
• 2004/08/03 RE: [slightly OT] spam storms? Chris Santerre
• 2004/08/03 Re: SA Logo Contest !! AMAZING!! Theo Van Dinter
• 2004/08/03 Re: SpamAssassin -- the O'Reilly book Michael W Cocke
• 2004/08/03 [slightly OT] spam storms? Chris Santerre
• 2004/08/03 rewrite_header not working Steve Suhre
• 2004/08/03 Re: SA Logo Contest !! AMAZING!! Justin Mason
• 2004/08/03 Re: make tests fail Matt Kettler
• 2004/08/03 Re: Compile errors with version 2.63 Tim Faircloth
• 2004/08/03 Re: Re[2]: more are more junk getting through Sandy S
• 2004/08/03 Re: Why only 2.3? Daniel Quinlan
• 2004/08/03 Re[3]: Increase this weekend? Robert Menschel
• 2004/08/03 Re: make tests fail Anne Ramey
• 2004/08/03 Re: more are more junk getting through Marc Kool
• 2004/08/03 Re[2]: more are more junk getting through Robert Menschel
• 2004/08/03 Re[2]: Increase this weekend? diane
• 2004/08/03 Re[2]: Increase this weekend? diane
• 2004/08/03 Re: more are more junk getting through Scot L. Harris
• 2004/08/03 Re[2]: Increase this weekend? Robert Menschel
• 2004/08/03 Re[2]: Increase this weekend? Robert Menschel
• 2004/08/03 Re: SA Logo Contest !! AMAZING!! Andy Jezierski
• 2004/08/03 header and body score David Jiménez Domínguez
• 2004/08/03 Re: networked spam tests - network intensive Nels Lindquist
• 2004/08/03 Re: SA Logo Contest !! AMAZING!! Michele Neylon : Blacknight Solutions
• 2004/08/03 Re: SpamAssassin -- the O'Reilly book LuKreme
• 2004/08/03 Re: more are more junk getting through Steve Prior
• 2004/08/03 Re: make tests fail Matt Kettler
• 2004/08/03 Re: SA Logo Contest !! AMAZING!! LuKreme
• 2004/08/03 RE: more are more junk getting through Scot L. Harris
• 2004/08/03 Re: SpamCopURI "make test" errors up
• 2004/08/03 Re: more are more junk getting through Marc Kool
• 2004/08/03 make tests fail Anne Ramey
• 2004/08/03 RE: more are more junk getting through Chris Santerre
• 2004/08/03 Re: more are more junk getting through Jim Maul
• 2004/08/03 Re: more are more junk getting through Marc Kool
• 2004/08/03 Re: basic bayes .. new use Matt Kettler
• 2004/08/03 Re: SpamCopURI "make test" errors Matt Kettler
• 2004/08/03 Re: What's all this about? Justin Mason
• 2004/08/03 Re: SpamCopURI "make test" errors Bob McClure Jr
• 2004/08/03 Re: networked spam tests - network intensive Alan Baxter
• 2004/08/03 Re: SpamCopURI "make test" errors Jim Maul
• 2004/08/03 Re: Why only 2.3? Asif Iqbal
• 2004/08/03 SpamCopURI "make test" errors up
• 2004/08/03 SA 2.63 no longer using user_prefs file Dave Goodrich
• 2004/08/03 RE: SpamAssassin -- the O'Reilly book David Groce
• 2004/08/03 Re: Compile errors with version 2.63 Theo Van Dinter
• 2004/08/03 RE: sample scoring zero Chris Santerre
• 2004/08/03 RE: No SURBL entries in logs? Chris Santerre
• 2004/08/03 RE: networked spam tests - network intensive Chris Santerre
• 2004/08/03 Re: SA Logo Contest !! AMAZING!! Dimitrios
• 2004/08/03 Re: SpamAssassin -- the O'Reilly book Andy Jezierski
• 2004/08/03 Re: SpamAssassin -- the O'Reilly book Michael W Cocke
• 2004/08/03 Re: Why only 2.3? Duncan Hill
• 2004/08/03 Re: Why only 2.3? Scot L. Harris
• 2004/08/03 Re: Why only 2.3? Duncan Hill
• 2004/08/03 Re: Why only 2.3? Bob Apthorpe
• 2004/08/03 Re: Compile errors with version 2.63 Alex S Moore
• 2004/08/03 Re: SA Logo Contest !! AMAZING!! D.J.
• 2004/08/03 Re: more are more junk getting through Sandy S
• 2004/08/03 Re: Why only 2.3? Jeff Chan
• 2004/08/03 Compile errors with version 2.63 Tim Faircloth
• 2004/08/03 Re: Detecting Phishers is not working. David Hooton
• 2004/08/03 Re: Detecting Phishers is not working. Jeff Chan
• 2004/08/03 Re: Why only 2.3? Duncan Hill
• 2004/08/03 Re: Why only 2.3? Jeff Chan
• 2004/08/03 Re: Why only 2.3? Asif Iqbal

• Earlier messages
• Later messages